Location
Type of ad Individual Offer
Description

In the case of Suman Mishra v. State of Uttar Pradesh, decided on February 12, 2025, another bench led by Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma decided on a similar issue. This matter arose as an appeal against a judgment by the Allahabad High Court dated August 31, 2022. Following the husband’s initiation of divorce proceedings, the wife lodged an FIR, and the court pointed out the suspicious timing of the complaint, indicating a possible retaliatory move. Statements of witnesses revealed that the allegations made were again too general and omnibus in nature and that they further lacked any solid and reliable incidents of the alleged harassment. The court found the FIR to be vexatious and not a genuine matter of dowry harassment.

Beware of scammers by reading our top tips on how to avoid a scam

Contact the advertiser

Don't forget to mention Vivastreet when you get in touch!

Legal Solution for False Dowry Harassment Charges Against

  • Rs p/h incall
  • Delhi

Anything wrong with this ad?

Let us know what the problem is, we will review it accordingly.

Send an email

Enter your email address to contact the advertiser

Didn't find what you were looking for?

< Back to results

Contact the advertiser

Don't forget to mention Vivastreet when you get in touch!

Legal Solution for False Dowry Harassment Charges Against

  • Rs p/h incall
  • Delhi

Tell us what you think