Legal Solution for False Dowry Harassment Charges Against
Location | Delhi Delhi |
Type of ad | Individual Offer |
In the case of Suman Mishra v. State of Uttar Pradesh, decided on February 12, 2025, another bench led by Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma decided on a similar issue. This matter arose as an appeal against a judgment by the Allahabad High Court dated August 31, 2022. Following the husband’s initiation of divorce proceedings, the wife lodged an FIR, and the court pointed out the suspicious timing of the complaint, indicating a possible retaliatory move. Statements of witnesses revealed that the allegations made were again too general and omnibus in nature and that they further lacked any solid and reliable incidents of the alleged harassment. The court found the FIR to be vexatious and not a genuine matter of dowry harassment.
Legal Solution for False Dowry Harassment Charges Against
- Rs p/h incall
- Delhi
Send an email
Send a message
Advertiser's email
By contacting this advertiser, you agree to Vivastreet's Terms and Conditions.
Save time in the future
Instantly access advertisers' email addresses with a Vivastreet account.
Create an accountDidn't find what you were looking for?
< Back to resultsSend a message
Advertiser's email
By contacting this advertiser, you agree to Vivastreet's Terms and Conditions.
Save time in the future
Instantly access advertisers' email addresses with a Vivastreet account.
Create an account